Ryan Day busy talking to scouts ahead of NFL Draft https://t.co/B4hzKl5U5y
— Marcus Hartman (@marcushartman) April 19, 2020
- Even just in a basketball sense, Jordan felt like a culmination of the first 50 years of the NBA if not the first 100 years of the game itself. There were great players before him. Great defenders. Great scorers. Great winners. Great showmen. He borrowed from all of them, took his lumps then emerged as the ultimate winner.
- I mean this is a guy who not only went 6-for-6 in the NBA Finals but also was the dominant force in all those series. He won both as the guy who made the final shot and the one who set it up. In his last act, he made a shot to bring the Bulls within a point of the Jazz, stole the ball from their best player then went back to the other end and made the game-winner. How is that for a final act?
- I'm excited to relive those days with the added perspective of more than a decade as sportswriter, and I'm interested to see how others react who did not live through it.
- I don't know what everyone else's expectations are, but I am guessing we see the glory of Jordan and those Bulls — warts and all. I think that will overall be a good thing, but there is a possibility it is not. It was known then he was a gruff competitor who would do anything to win, including trying to destroy his teammates in order to get the best of them. He's gone on to be a somewhat enigmatic figure since, still a very successful businessman but not able to build a basketball winner. He also seems to maintain a more old-school outlook on the world, and that is not always welcome in today's media climate.
- Obviously, my experience following those Bulls was shaped by my lack of perspective then. I loved it more because I didn't have to overthink it by comparing it to anything else. I get frustrated with a lot of sports talk these days (and probably even more so news) because of a lack of perspective (too many people seem unable to take into consideration anything that happened more than five minutes ago), so I'm curious to see if this fills in some gaps for some of the younger crowd and creates more appreciation for Jordan. But it might provide ammunition for his detractors, too.
Michael Jordan vs. LeBron James: Final answer https://t.co/mbbtxx6qOs pic.twitter.com/teOo6mXGvh
— daytonsports (@daytonsports) July 2, 2018
- Here's the bottom line: Myth-making has always been a major part of sports. Watching people compete is cool, but pretending they are practically gods makes it even better. It also attracts more attention, and that enhances the collective experience. You can't have one without the other. Nowadays we know more about our athletes than ever, and that is both a good thing and a bad thing. Sometimes we know too much, and sometimes all those personalities blend together whereas we used to get to know just so many players, and only so well.
- Jordan was different, and so was his era. Now how will they look?
“Marcus Musings” is a semi-regular feature here at the blog. While most of our other coverage is concentrated on news and analysis, this is a place to share opinions on various stories permeating the sports world and (hopefully) have some fun. Have your own thoughts? Send them along to marcus.hartman@coxin.com or find us on Twitter or Facebook.
About the Author