Issue 1 is so smelly that four former governors — two Republicans and two Democrats — oppose it: Former Govs. Bob Taft, Ted Strickland, John R. Kasich and Richard F. Celeste. Also opposing Issue 1 are five former Ohio attorneys general — two Republicans and three Democrats
Issue 1 is a scheme by Statehouse operators and their enablers, who fear that fed-up Ohioans will use their power as citizens to bypass an unresponsive, gerrymandered General Assembly.
That’s the same simon-pure legislature that helped enable the $61 million House Bill 6-FirstEnergy scandal, and the virtuous legislature that has yet to repeal HB 6 altogether, even though the House’s former Republican leader is serving 20 years in the jug for engineering the HB 6 affair.
Issue 1 would cheat Ohio voters in three ways:
- Since 1912, Ohioans have been able to ratify a proposed state constitutional amendment with a simple majority — 50% plus 1 — of those voting on it. Issue 1 would require an amendment to draw a “yes” vote of at least 60%.
- Issue 1 would make it harder — arguably, nearly impossible — for Ohioans to petition to place a proposed amendment on the ballot.
- Now, backers of a proposed amendment must gather a specified percentage of voter signatures in 44 of Ohio’s 88 counties. Issue 1 would require gathering that specified percentage in all 88 counties.
- Then this: Now, if petitioners come up short of the necessary number of signatures — currently, 413,487 (10% of the votes cast in the last governor’s election) — petitioners are granted 10 days to gather the needed signatures (the so-called “cure period”). Issue 1 would abolish the cure period.
Of course, there’s an agenda here, but the backers of Issue 1 aren’t advertising it. Issue 1 was crafted to block an abortion-rights amendment that’s being proposed for Ohio’s November statewide ballot.
How so? Well, in four of the states whose voters ratified abortion rights amendments in response to the Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization ruling, the “yes” vote on those amendments came in at under 60%: Kansas, 59%; Michigan, 56.7%; Kentucky, 52.4%; and Montana, 52.6%.
So, no coincidence, Issue 1 would set a 60% floor on “yes” votes when Ohioans consider future constitutional amendments. And as Republican Secretary of State Frank LaRose, Ohio’s chief elections officer, has conceded, Issue 1 is “100%” about abortion.
If voters approve Issue 1, then a November abortion-rights amendment would require a “yes” vote of at least 60% to become part of the Ohio Constitution.
But access to abortion isn’t the only target of Issue 1. So is an anti-gerrymandering amendment likely to surface in 2024. “Gerrymandering” means rigging the boundaries of General Assembly and congressional districts to make it easier for one party or the other to capture them.
And the Statehouse’s GOP leaders couldn’t care less what courts say about rigged districts. An effective 2024 anti-gerrymandering amendment would help end Statehouse business-as-usual. That’s precisely what insiders fear and why they are so determined to weaken voters’ power via Issue 1,
Voting “no” on Issue 1 sends a message to an out-of-control General Assembly: Enough, ladies and gentlemen, is enough.
Thomas Suddes is a former legislative reporter with The Plain Dealer in Cleveland and writes from Ohio University. You can reach him at tsuddes@gmail.com.
About the Author