Ohio lawmakers approve ‘Parents Bill of Rights’ with provision requiring release for religious instruction

Ohio lawmakers this week passed a package of controversial education bills, including the “Parents Bill of Rights Act” — derided by critics as a forced outing bill for LGBTQ+ youth — and a measure mandating public school districts to allow students to attend third-party religious instruction during the school day.

The measure, Ohio House Bill 8, passed mostly along party lines 24-to-7 in the Senate, with one Republican objector, and 57-to-31 in the House, with three Republican objectors (including Rep. Andrea White, R-Kettering). It now goes to Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine for his signature.

The Parents Bill of Rights framework originally sought to establish a mandatory line of communication between public schools and students’ parents, but the bill received significant backlash from LGBTQ+ students and advocates over a provision that requires school officials to report significant changes in a student’s mental health to the student’s parents.

The American Civil Liberties Union and statehouse Democrats argued that the provision will essentially function as a “forced outing” mandate for LGBTQ+ students who have not yet come out at home, potentially putting them in danger.

When the bill cleared the Ohio House last June, bill sponsor Sara Carruthers, R-Hamilton, told this outlet that she’d be open to amending the bill to address the forced outing concerns. “It has nothing to do with LGBTQ+; it never did, it shouldn’t,” she said.

But the Ohio Senate declined to add explicit safeguards to the bill, denying an amendment proposed by Democrats that would allow school districts to “withhold such information from a a parent if a reasonably prudent person would believe the disclosure would result in abuse, abandonment or neglect.”

The Senate did, however, amend H.B. 8 to require Ohio’s public school districts to adopt a policy to allow students to leave class in the middle of the day to attend third-party religious instruction.

Democrats argued that the law would disrupt students’ school days and burden teachers.

Former public school teacher and administrator Rep. Adam Bird, R-New Richmond, argued late Wednesday night that mandatory religious release would actually be beneficial to public schools, which are increasingly faced with the potential of losing students to private schools following the state’s investment of over a billion dollars into a new private school voucher program.

“I would give this warning to the opponents of release time for religious instruction: If you continue to push back, and if you continue to tell parents that they can’t choose just a few minutes a day of release time for religious instruction, you’re going to leave them with no choice but to leave for the entire day and go to a Christian school, a charter school, a non-public school,” Bird said.

About the Author